Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR656 14
Original file (NR656 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
TUR
Docket No: 656-14
29 January 2015

 

your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of -the United
States Code, section 1552,

A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

session, considered your ;
application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest’ of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a

timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement which
- noted in part, that ‘there was no error in your record, your

misconduct was for experimental use of drugs, and Your post
service conduct should be considered by the Board’ as the basis

for waiving the Statute of limitations. The Board determined

the statute since there
is no evidence Provided that indicates you were unable to file

your application within the three years from when you learned of

Sincerely,

ROEERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR622 14

    Original file (NR622 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of | your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘your discharged was based on your first...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR629 14

    Original file (NR629 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to Submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘you were unaware of the process regarding...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR625 14

    Original file (NR625 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a ‘timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘you were discharged without much thought given...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR722 14

    Original file (NR722 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed; and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement ‘I have become a productive citizen in my community.’ as the basis...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13160 14

    Original file (NR13160 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROQ6157-14 19 Taswitoass OAT aa A eve This ig in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section 1552. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR611 14

    Original file (NR611 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. As a result, the Board was unable.to discern from your record or application why your application was filed 20 years after the statute of limitations had run. your’ application is not-possible.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0853 14

    Original file (NR0853 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ame BUARU FUR CURREUIIUN Ur NAVAL RECORUS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Beis. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was mot timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina . As a result, the Board was unable to discern from your record or application why your application was filed 44 years after the statute of limitations had run.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0809 14

    Original file (NR0809 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 0809-14 an Tv eq sees ” 28 January 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0852 14

    Original file (NR0852 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. As a result, the Board was unable to discern from your record or application why your application was filed 40...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR612 14

    Original file (NR612 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. record or application why your application * was filed 14 years after the atatute of limitations had run. discovered ‘relevant evidence which was not reasonable ‘available to you when-you submitted your application.